...It's called the "Autofocus Problems Page," and I'm finding it rather
>interesting. But like I say I haven't mustered the fortitude yet to
>really digest it. I'd like to hear from some of the pros here on the
>data expressed and interprted at this site:
Interesting reading Ken, (well, the one article I read on focusing
inaccuracies) but it sounds like technically accurate but artistically void
BS. I'm not a professional, but if I scan it in as 2710dpi and look at the
scan at say 400% or just look at the slide with an 8X loupe and it looks in
focus, I'll call it in focus whether some technical genius says my camera
wasn't precise or not. The author seems disgruntled about something. Maybe
he just can't compose a descent photo so he want to point out problems for
everyone else.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
