> I would also like
> to get a 100 - 400 IS lens as a replacement to the Sigma 170 - 500 as it is
> compatible with the Canon extenders. Has anyone had experience of this lens
> with the above extenders? How does it perform?
>From all the wonderful things I've heard about the 100-400, and
my personal test of the 170-500, which I found lacking and returned,
I think you'll be very happy with the change. Even without the IS
it will be a big improvement. I haven't tried it myself, but I'd bet
that the 100-400+2x is as sharp as the 170-500 at the 500 end.
Jim
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************