--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
> Did anyone have a chance to compare Canon 35-350L and Sigma 50-500
lenses?
> At $1000 Sigmas seems like a good choice - cheaper and large range.
Any
> comments? Thought? Also, how about 35-350L vs 70/80-200 2.8L with
TCs?
> George
No comment on 35/350 or 50/500 but the URL below has comments on
both.
http://www.photographyreview.com/reviews/35mm_zoom_lenses/
I had the 70/200 f2.8 and it was heavy, fast and very sharp.
Surprisingly fast with a 2X but then I bought the 100-400 IS and it
was all over - sold the lens. I sometimes miss the 200 f/2.8 but
then I will buy the prime version at half the cost/weight.
Rgds, Dave Behrens
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
