----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> in regards to the 200 2.8L with a teleconverter, would I lose the ability
to
> autofocus? Also, what is the image quality like with todays
teleconverters?
> I have heard that the image quality is considerably less when you add a
> teleconverter to a lens. I like the idea of combining the 200 2.8L and a
> teleconverter because I would get the focal length of the 400 at a
fraction
> of the cost, and I can still use the prime lens as a 200 if I so desire.
>
Actually, the cost of a 200 2.8 plus a GOOD teleconverter isn't much
different than what you would spend for a 400 5.6L, but you do gain the nice
200 2.8, hich is a big bonus.
Tom P.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
