> Skip wrote: ...
> Julian, you ask the question on the DOC, "Where did the A2 name
> come from?" In my opinion, it was to emphasize the linearity
> from the old FD mount cameras. The pro F1 begat the pro EOS 1,
> thus the A-1, top consumer camera, begat the A2. Of course,
> this bypasses the "T" series, not to mention the 600 series
> and 10s AF cameras, but what the heck!
Hi Skip,
That question was actually posed by Gary Fisher. I just did
the cross-reference table. EOSDOC is supposed to be a self-
sustaining collaborative effort (like photo.net)
So where does the EOS 3 fit in? And what will the
replacement for A2E be called, now that we have EOS 30
and EOS 33?
How about EOS 3.333333 :-)
Cheers
Julian Loke
http://eosdoc.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
