> QUESTIONS:
>
> 1. Given my current lens (Tamron 28- 200 3.5/5.6), am
> I really stepping up by going to, say a package
> consisting of 28-135 IS 3.5/5.6 and 70-200 3.5-4.6 or
> 100-300 4.5-5.6? If yes, could someone articulate the
> benefits?
>
Oh yeah!! Trading in Tamron 28-200 to EF28-135 is exactly what I did, the
Tamron is an OK lens, it certainly has an amazing zoom range that you will
miss, but I found the quality of the images, ie. sharpness, brightness, as
well as AF performance improved noticeably with the Canon lens, even it
wasn't an L lens.
Regards,
Ken
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
