Any opinions on the earler version of the 200mm f/2.8? I know a
couple of folks here rave about the current one, but how is the Mk.I?
I assume it's not USM, but otherwise?
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
