Vesa Perala wrote:
>
> >What I don't understand is, why Nikon uses silent wave only in expensive
> >lenses and fails to combine it with their version of IS. This will cost
> >them
> >a bunch of customers.
>
> I wouldn't be surpriced if they introduce "this" year (may be valid
> statement next year as well) SW + VR lenses. Would you?
> They have their first VR lens out just like canon had the tele zoom
> and 300/4L before the super teles came.
Well, their first VR wasn't really available some time ago, I don't even
know if it is available NOW in reasonable quantities. Henry should
likely know. So they are YEARS behind Canon. Canon is at the 3rd
generation of IS lenses right now. And that is what I don't understand.
Do they try to test the patience of their customers? ;-) I don't think
this is a good idea. They should rather try to win some customers back.
Then I could buy some used EOS stuff cheap. Come on, Nikon!!! :-)))))))
And as for Canon: You really should add a 28 and/or 35 mm TSE lens to
the line. 24mm is too wide for e.g. most architecture shots (too extreme
perspective). Ok, we can always use a 1.4x TC, but why should we have to
do so?
Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
