>Jonathan Kwok wrote:
> >
> > (Part 2; continued over from EF 70-200 f/2.8L vs 70-200L f/4. Part 1)
> >
> > Optical Performance
> >
> > I have conducted systematic tests comparing both these lenses, shooting
> > images of my custom-designed test targets with the lenses mounted onto
>an
........snip
> > streaking through the frame, compared to heavy ghosting and green flare
> > blobs with the EF28-70L.
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > Please refer to Part 3 of this review.
> >
> > Warm regards,
> > Jonathan Kwok
> >
>Well, Jonathan, thanks for your comprehensive assessment. That pretty
>much convinces me that the f4 is the lens to get my wife. Most, if ot
>all of her usage of this lens will be outside, so the 1 stop difference
>shouldn't make much of a difference.
>Thanks again!
>Skip
>
Skip,
I'm sure you quoted the *whole* part 2 of Jonathan's review
by accident, not by purpose...
Vesa
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
