> I just posted two comparisons of the 28-90 and 28-135 lenses, see my
> other post about the difference in focal lengths. Now these are low
> res scans (150 dpi - but it's just for the monitor) and automated
> prints, so I don't expect much, but I'd welcome ANY comments and
> observations.
>
> I tried to keep the reproduction as much under control as possible.
> The only manipulation I did, I did equally, which was to run each
> photo thrpugh a 10% sharpen filter to try and restore something of
> what clarity there is in the print.
>
> Hopefully your browser or graphics app will allow you to pull up each
> pair and compare. Each pair was shot with exactly the same settings,
> just changing the lens.
First off, you're right, big difference in magnification of the two red
roses. As to quality of other things, the 28-135 seems to have more
contrast. I think I might shoot a couple frames like this on my next roll,
using the 35-135 and 75-300 at, say 100mm.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
