--- jp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the 1.4 is a higher quality piece than the 2x, mo'
> better glass.. 
> likely to be MUCH better than the Tamron....

I believe this is only true for the older version. The
new 2x and new 1.4x have the same price. This is a bit
strange as the new 2x has more elements then the 1.4x,
is very likely of the same built quality as the 1.4x,
and is a new design. Makes me wonder how to justify
previous reasonings why the old 1.4x was more
expensive then the old 2x?!

By the way, it seems that the new 2x is a new design
whereas the new 1.4 'just' added more protection and
flare reduction. Therefore, I wonder if somebody has
made a comparison and could detect an improvement over
the old 2x.

Robert

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to