Hi all -
Please forgive the OT post - you can respond off-list unless you think
there's wide enough interest in answers. That is if I don't get drawn
and quartered for cross-posting FD and EOS lists! ;-) Lot of
knowledgeable folks on both, though.
I don't have much experience with filters, and want to know if the
really expensive ones are really "worth it." I know you get what
you pay for, but I can't see spending $1,000 on a filter set. What do
you lose when you use Hoya or Tiffen as opposed to B+W and Heliopan?
Or is that even a valid division? I already spent close to $100 for
the B+W UV on my 28-135, and am getting some filters for B&W for my FD
kit, too. A 52mm B+W is already $38.
I'd also like to get a few polarizers for various lenses, and again,
what differences am I going to see between a $200 B+W 72mm and a $75
Hoya or Omega? And how about the new Omega filters? B&H doesn't
even list them, has anyone read any reports?
Thanks as always
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
