Hello all! "If you could pick one of these which one would it be? Why? I'm trying to decide myself and I've heard stories about the 17-35mm distortion problems. (I know it will at 20 and below but what about the rest of the range?) I'd like to hear from people that have or those that have used the lens and their experiences. Wonder if Canon will do away with any problems with the new 16-35mm? ; )" Justin, The 20-35 was my main zoom with EOS 1 and after EOS 1N. When moving to EOS1V I changed too to 17-35. My opinion based on the use of both zooms: I believe sharpness of old was slightly better, mainly at 20. Distortion was slightly worse but not so much. USM is more convenient on 17-35. Flare and vignetting appears as to be quite similar but the three milimeters more in the wide side are really interesting. I use less often the 14mm but when using the D-30 where is really convenient. So if you have a 20-35 it is not so necessary to change. Starting from none is more convinient to get a 17-354 as used price of 20-35 is not particularly cheep and, finally, 17-35 is more equilibrated. Just MHO Kind regards F�lix * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
