> fraction of focal length, "constant" aperture zooms are really
> "constant ratio" zooms, aren't they?

Yes.

> Could that in any way
> explain the difference in viewfinder brightness asked about between a
> prime and a zoom?  

In a constant-aperture zoom, the amount of light comming in should be the same. In a 
variable aperture zoom, the light would dim a bit (I didn't notice it with my 3.5-5.6 
zoom though).

> In a variable aperture zoom,  if you dial in max aperture, and then
> zoom out,  the aperture  increases in steps, i.e 4, 4.5 5.6.

Because the aperture area is constant...

> and each
> step remains constant for a certain percentage of the zoom range.

No, as I said above, the aperture area is constant...

> This obviously means that you aren't getting precise f-stops
> throughout the range, which is probably part of the lesser cost of
> such lenses.

No, th fact that the aperture changes over the zoom range "masks" optical 
short-commings if a 3.5-5.6 lens had been 3.5 all the way, the lense properties would 
most likely be utter crap at the long end (the lens wasn't designed to be good at say 
80/3.5, but "stopped" down to 5.6, it performs acceptable).

> In a "constant aperture" zoom how is this avoided?  Or
> is it? Is there actually a continuous range of aperture available?

If the aperture area had been constant in a constant-aperture lens, then the lens 
would be utter crap in the short end (because the resulting aperture would be 
something like f/0.x, at wich only extremely few lenses are good).

> I'm sure someone will straighten me out if this is really
> misconceived!

There might be some errors in what I wrote (swapped big for small, long for short 
etc.), but I think it's correct. I'm no expert on the subject, but I recal seeing this 
explanation on rec.photo.equipment.35mm some time ago...

Corrections are welcome...

Snorre

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to