Why not?  Why a 70-200 /2.8 IS?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > No, I am still waiting for my 200/2.8 IS/DO,
> 
> Why?
> 
> Lars
> --
> Lars Michael                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 87GT                             http://www.larsmichael.com/
>
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to