--- Tim Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From Gary Fisher,
> > Canon have stated that both will continue to be
> > sold.
<snip>
> > This is good news from the point of view of
choice,
> > but perhaps not so good from the cost viewpoint.
> > IMO if Canon had replaced the original with the
> > IS model, the IS model would have been introduced
> > at a price point closer to the original.
> >
> > But at least there is still a choice and the IS
> > model will probably drop in price over time
anyway.
> >
> Whilst the choice is a good thing, surely Canon
> could have done better?
>
> When Nikon brought out their 80-200 AF-S, the older
> lens was not only retained in the line-up, its price
> was greatly reduced as well.
We live in hope, just don't hold our collective
breaths...
Gary
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
