> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 22:48:32 +0200
> From: "Rune Tallaksen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: EOS Wich 50 mm do you reccomend and why?
>
> I am in the process of once again spending money on new
> EOS gear. This time on a 50 mm. Which one do you recommend
> and why?
The 2.5/50 mm compact macro for its unparred sharpness
and versatility at acceptable speed.
> Are the differences between the 50 /1.4 and the 50/1.8
> so big that it defends the difference in price?
In making, handling, mechanical workmanship - yes, the
difference to the current 1.8 is drastic. If you can get
hold of a 1.8 mark I (metal mount) it will not be that bad.
The difference in speed is a mere half f-stop.
Not much if you rarely use it at low light, but maybe
decisive if you do so often. However, in this case I'd
rather go for the 1.2/85 mm L USM.
So, if speed is a concern, the 1.4 is okay.
If mechanic quality is a concern, as well.
If price is your point, the 1.8 is still an
excellent lens.
If you are after max optical quality, then
go for the macro.
--
Michael Quack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Again, this is very advanced technology. You will not see
these pictures on any other channel. (CNN live coverage)
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
