I'm torn...I've read rave reviews of the 135L and also of the 100 usm macro.
But, I'll probably be taking more portrait type photos than macro photos. Is the 135 really that much better than the macro for portraiture, with regard to bokeh, perspective, handling, etc? (Note that I left off 'sharpness' :-) -- Benson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smack-dab in the North Carolina foothills * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
