F. Craig Callahan wrote:
> Not exactly what I was saying. Indeed, if I were making a
> recommendation for a lens in
> this focal range, I would suggest that for most people the
> 20-35/3.5~4.5 would be a
> better choice than any of the wide-angle "L" zooms. Of
> course, there are those who have
> a specific need for what the "L" zooms offer, in which case
> the more expensive lenses
> (or a fixed-focal-length alternative) are the better choice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Actually according to svery test I have seen and my own used the
Canon EF lens quality is ranked as follows:
20-35mm F2.8L
20-35mm F3.5-4.5 (but much less expensive)
17-35mm F2.8L
If you really want a bargain for your EOS its the Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX.
Peter K
(I own a Tamron 20-40mm F2.7-3.5)
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
