In a message dated 12/13/01 2:43:13 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Thanks to the responses to my question on the Tamron lens. After looking at those review sights it seems like the two Tokinas, the 28-80 2.8 and the 28-70 2.6-2.8 are far better. Has anyone here used either, what are your impressions of the two? From the reviews it sounds like the 28-70 2.6-2.8may be slightly better, is this others experience? TIA >> Hi, Never used Tokina 28-70 ATX Pro , but I do have a newer 28-80 and I think it's great. Based on many reviews, most of the people that had a problem with this lens are Nikon users. I think there was some compatibility issue. I like this lens a lot. I have taken many photos with it and never had a problem with flare, as long as I used a hood. Mine is very sharp and AF speed is very good, while motor is quiet. AF/MF switch is great too. I use it with older bodies - 1N, RT and Elan and never had a problem, but it's possible that with newer ones there may be some compatibility problems. So, IMO - it's worth the money. On the other hand, 28-70 is proven lens, while with a bit slower AF and noisier motor, and AF/MF switch more awkward, it's a very good performer optically. And cheaper. So, if you have a chance - check both out at the store and see what you like. I think samples of Tokina 28-80 vary more significantly than that of 28-70. George * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
