> I would get some of the more obvious benefits of digital (immediate feedback, no need to wait for processing, easy > > sharing of photos, the luxury of not having to "save" film, and thus be able to experiment more). The big minus is the > on-camera flash, which will probably result in a lot of red-eye. Has anyone tried to go this route, with cheaper > > >digitals?
To me the Canon S30 was the answer for a "cheaper digital." It has most of the features of the G1/G2, except for the faster lens, 4MP CCD and hot shoe, is considerably smaller and produces a fine 3.2 MP image, IMO. I knew I wouldn't carry the G2 with me a much as the S30 - size WAS an issue for me. Check the user opinions on this camera at http://www.dpreview.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
