--- Skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NOt having used the IS lens, I can't comment > from direct experience, but it does seem to be > the general consensus that the IS version is > indeed better than the old one...from both tests > and users, alike.
This is not true for the 400/5.6IS, AFAIK. Obviously, the quality depends a lot on the design. A good lens with good components, good coatings, etc can be better then a bad lens that has fewer elements. In other words, a new design with more elements does not make the lens necessary worse then a previous design with less elements. Robert __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeing new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
