Chip how would you compare the Superia Reala and Supra? I really like at 100 speed, Superia Reala and Gold 100... thanks!
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Louie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: EOS Supra 400 v. Superia 400 outdoors > > > > > > With all the photogs here I thought I would ask if anyone > has compared use > > of the Suji Superia X-Tra 400 to Kodak's Supra400 in actual > use. I am > > curious to learn which actually holds up better in > > daylight/sunlight. Anyone > > try these? > > > > Hi Peter, > > I use Kodak's Supra ISO 100 & 400 and they are both impressive films, > especially when you consider the price. I tried 1/2 a brick > of Fuji Superia > Xtra 400 a few months ago and IMO it's not as good as Kodak's > Supra 400. Of > course this may have been the C-41 line it was run through at > A&I but I find > that A&I's line for other Fuji films I use to be excellent. > A&I uses Fuji > Crystal Archive papers normally and I had some other Kodak > print film (Royal > Gold 100 RA, Supra 400, Gold 100 GA), processed at the same > time and they > all looked great. > > I switched to the Supra films because they produce excellent > prints and at > only a very slight bump in cost over Kodak Gold or Fuji > Superia Reala films. > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
