Hi,
I wanted to buy the Canon 20-35 USM. But since prices in the USA are much lower than in Europe I'm thinking about purchasing a Canon (16)17- 35 f/2.8L AF at B&H. I will be shooting mainly landscapes with this lens. Is it worth upgrading from 20-35 to 17-35; is the 17-35 above 20 mm optical much better than the 20-35 usm? Is it worth upgrading from Canon 17-35 to 16-35 pure for optics (my body is not dust resistance) Thanks Mark BTW any other suggestions than B&H for buying this lens? * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
