What do you people think about the idea of an Image Stabilized Macro lens? Seems like an excellent candidate - either the 100 or the 180. I do a lot of macro shooting, and with the small f/stops and slow film frequently required I find myself shooting at shutter speeds between 1/8 and 1/60 all the time - perfect IS range. With the odd angles often required to get close to weird stuff, it sure would be nice to not always require a tripod. Doesn't this idea make sense? What downsides am I missing, besides the cost?
Ken Durling Photo.net portfolio: http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251 * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
