Before dropping the subject, I just want to say that before slamming a film, I think we should all know a little more about it, and what it's good at and what its weaknesses are. If you're saying Kodachrome 200 is grainy, you probably aren't using it for its strengths. Kodachrome 200 requires a standout subject, such as a portrait, macro, or wild animal in sharp focus against a blurred background. I have 8x10s with very fine grain taken with Kodachrome 200. I also have 4x6s of night landscapes with very pronounced grain. Kodachrome 200 is extremely sharp and has a great color palette in various types of lighting. If you haven't taken the time to study it and just dismissed it as being terrible, you're doing yourself a disservice. Perhaps I've done the same thing with E100VS.
Michael _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
