> From: Michael Fontana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: EOS No one is slamming K200 > > Peter, > > I was referring to the post by Terence Danks. > > Michael
Well, I certainly stand by my opinion but, of course, that is what it is. I consider it informed. I tried the stuff and found it nothing much less than utterly wretched. And I am no slammer of Kodachrome in general. Used it for decades. Finally left because the processing hassles/delays just got to be too much. Given it were pushable and processing available locally, I'd still be using K25 and K64. Why someone would use this film is beyond me. . Tried it and threw the other rolls away. If you like it . . . your prerogative. But, I don't understand it and the explanantion of what it supposedly is "good for" does not hold water IMO. I can muck up slides with excess grain in photoshop if I want that effect, which I emphatically do not. -- Terence A. Danks Nature & Wildlife Photography http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/danksta/home.htm * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
