To be honest, I agree and disagree. If you are doing wddings, portraiture etc, then digital, esp 6 megapixel is good enough. Saves a lot of time, not to mention giving you lots of freedom. I am a strong film believer but I am not stupid either :-)
I have a 4000dpi scanner as well - when I want to shoot for myself, like scenics etc, I scan them in, but otherwise, i use my digital. When I go swing dancing, I used to shoot at least 2 rolls, at least cost me $30 of money and not to mentioned the time it took me to scan them. Now I take more then hundred shots, immediately on the web.... I will sell my d30 next month probably. it will save me enough to pay for the depreciation in price. D30 is a tool, and I am trying to make the best of it. cheers. > -----Original Message----- > From: F. Craig Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:28 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: EOS D60 for $1500? > > > > > "Trieu, Ethan" wrote: > > > Hypothetically, if you were given the chance to buy a D60 > for $1500 (USD), > > would you get one? > > No. I would use that money for a 4000 ppi scanner. Just as > the D30 is already > obsolete, the > D60 will also quickly become a has-been. Because my film > images are better than > can be had > from any current or upcoming digital camera (as good as I can * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
