--- Craig Zendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I realise it's difficult to quantify the quality of > a lens. > > My criteria may be very different to yours. > > Like most photographers I strive to achieve the > highest technical standards, > but as 95% of my work is viewed on the printed page, > no bigger than A4, > trying to eke out every last bit of resolution, etc. > is not a major > consideration. The litho print process is great > leveller of equipment and > technique. > > If your thing is to produce 30"x20" prints that are > examined from 12 inches, > then I'm not the right person to ask if a > lens/film/print combination can do > this. > > I care little about 'bokeh'. The day a client > questions the quality of my > out of focus areas, I'll rethink. Until then I'll > concentrate on my in focus > areas.
<snip> > I am committed to the Canon system, there equipment > is amongst the finest > available. Others are committed to other systems. <snip> > Regards > > Craig Z Craig: I think this is a good an explanation of my feelings about equipment and photography as I ever seen in print. While I know not everyone agrees with us, some people seem to get so wrapped up in the equipment that they forget the point of it all is to make an image. Thanks! Bob Meyer ===== Bob Meyer I wish I knew what I know now, when I was younger... http://www.meyerweb.net/epson __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards� http://movies.yahoo.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
