> From: "Keith Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What is the maximum realistic enlargement that we can expect > from 35mm film? Assuming a reasonable quality lens (not > necessarily L), and fine grain film. > Not everyone agrees on this topic. West Coast Imaging states that 11x14 is the largest you can get before you'd be better off with MF. (Actually, they say 11x14 is "almost" the quality of MF: http://www.westcoastimaging.com/wci/page/info/articles/formatsize.html). I was just reading a book an MF photography by Roger Hicks, and he states that, for b&w photos, he wouldn't go over 8x10 with 35 mm, for tonality reasons.
But I know that Galen Rowell has enlarged some of his work to 40"x50", and he only works 35 mm. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
