It was my understanding that was one of the problems with the 17-35, softness wide open. Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Icoz, Evrim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: RE: EOS 16-35/2.8 vs 17-35/2.8
> The 2.8 pics so different that i wonder if there was another variable > involved. One is incredibly soft. > > > Take a look at this site: > > http://www.fredmiranda.com/17_35VS16_35/index.html > > It gives a pretty comprehensive comparo of the two lenses in question. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
