Hi fellow listmembers,

for the past year I've been trying to decide what telelens to buy. I
currently own Canon's 28-135 IS and 50/1.8 mk1 lens and a Tokina
20-35/3.5-5.6, so I've got the short and normal end sufficiently covered,
but I would like to have something with a bit more reach. Main purpose
would be portraits/candids and for isolating detail in landscape
photography and anything else that I get interested in once I 've got a
long lens at my disposal and learn how to use it. I have handled a friends
EF 75-300, but found its focus irritatingly slow and the build quality not
so great. Since I would not mind spending a few euros more I'm currently
considering the 200/2.8 (second hand), 80-200/2.8 (second hand, obviously)
and 70-200/4 (new, seems impossible to find second hand in the
Netherlands). All these lenses are in the same price range. The 200 prime
and the 80-200 zoom both have a 72 mm filter thread, which is nice since I
own a couple of filters in that size. Also, both are black which I consider
to be an advantage. The 80-200 is with its 1.3 kilos twice as heavy as the
other two. Buying the 70-200 would get me a brand new lens, but without a
tripod collar which limits its usefullness (so I would have to spend extra
money for a tripod collar). The 200 is light, fast, black, but not a zoom
lens. And all three lenses "only" go to 200 mm, and I'm not quite sure if I
would like/need something up to 300 mm. See my dilemma?

I would greatly appreciate your opinions on this, to help me make up my
mind! What did or didn't you buy or and why (or why not)?How much of a
disadvantage would you consider the 80-200's weight to be? Would 1.3 kilos
be too heavy for you? What you rather have a 300 than a 200 mmm lens, or do
you find the difference of little importance in real life situations?

Thanks,

Bart


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to