Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:14:14 -0700 From: Chip Louie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Re[2]: EOS New 28-70/2.8L ?
>Inexpensive IS lenses are a big compromise, cutting cost on IS lenses will >get us more dogs like the EF 75-300IS and to a lesser extent the EF 300 4L >IS. Why do you consider that these lenses are "dogs"? The 75-300 I can understand, but the 300/4L? Also how do you rate the IS in the 100-400L IS? Regards Hugo _______________________________________________________ Vizzavi Mail powered by Vodafone - http://www.vizzavi.pt Virus protected by TrendMicro - http://www.antivirus.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
