After all this talk about the EF 300/4L IS being "a dog" and "a disaster", I started wondering what alternatives those of us who feel that the 200mm end of our 70-200/2.8 is too short for some shots, are left with? If you want IS on a long lens, but don't want to sell the car to buy a 300/2.8 IS, I think that the 100-400 IS is the only viable option. Those who have shot with these lenses, what do you think? How do you compare image quality and versatility? I think that the zoom should be more versatile. You can switch between 300mm and 400mm without having to take off the lens to install a 1.4x converter. BTW, anybody know what are these lenses true focal lengths?
Regards Hugo _______________________________________________________ Vizzavi Mail powered by Vodafone - http://www.vizzavi.pt Virus protected by TrendMicro - http://www.antivirus.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
