On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:36:49 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:

>The 70-200 with 2x works very well.  I've not actually
>compared the 70-200 IS + 2x with the 100-400, but I
>did compare the older 70-200 + 2x.  AT 400mm, I found
>them very comparable. 


You may already be familiar with this, but Michael Reichmann compared
the two at:

 http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/400v400.shtml

Not terribly in-depth, but informative nonetheless.


Ken Durling

Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio:
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=203
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to