Circle closed... just like the Rolleikin (35 mm adapter) for my beloved Rolleiflex!
Per :-) Bob Talbot wrote: > >>Well, why? Even when cropping a D1s image to D60 size (1/1.6 > factor), >>it will still have slightly more pixels than a full D60 frame, so > why bother with a separate body? Finder masking (similar to the D100 > lines) plus software cropping would be a simpler solution. > > Per > > Heretic!!!! > > > Before you know it people will latch on to the fact that you can > obtain "focal length multiplication" with conventional film by merely > cropping out the centre of the frame ;o) > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
