>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Bell
>
>
>Was there ever a 70-200 f2.8L that *wasn't* USM?

Nope. But there was a 80-200/2.8L which wasn't USM but ARC. It still did
focus very fast, though. Also this is one of the few black L lenses. It's a
great lens but unfortunately does not take the Canon teleconverters.

Robert

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to