Regarding the 35/1.4, take a look at this link: http://www.techphoto.org/urllink.epl?html=/photo/equipment/canon/35_1.4.epl The interesting point is that you buy this lens for two reasons; it's fast for low light and it has great sharpness edge to edge. Unfortunately, it seems to me you are spending a ton of money on Canon advanced engineering which you will never use, the performance around the edge of the image circle which gets cropped by the small sensor. At one time I owned a 14/2.8, 24/1.4 and 35/1.4. When I sold my 14 and got a 16-35 I virtually never touched the 35 and used the 24 exclusively for low light. I sold the 35 and used the money to trade up from a "non-IS" to IS 70-200. I have no experience with the 135. John --- "Marc S. Fogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I am seriously considering getting a 35 F1.4L > and 135 F2.0L for my 10D as opposed to zooms. Does > anyone have any sample images posted with these two > lens. > If there wasn't a 1.6 multiplier on the 10D I > wouldn't have such a hard time choosing lenses. For > instance because of the multiplier should I get the > 16-35 F2.8L instead of 35 F1.4L. If the 10D was full > frame or I was shooting with film I would get the 35 > F1.4L > > Thank > Marc
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
