Tom Pfeiffer wrote: > > Well, there is the Canon 24-85mm. I've owned at least three of them, > they are very nice lenses. USM, full time manual focus, distance scale, > non-rotating front element, in other words all those things your > friend's 28-80 doesn't have, plus the 4mm on the wide end and 5mm on the long end. > And it's at least a full stop faster at every focal length. The only > downside is the 67mm filter size. So next time he asks, you'll be able > to tell him the truth?
Tom, The 70-200 f4L also has a 67mm filter size, so they make a sensible pair. The only trouble is that I prefer the 20-35 to the 24-85, and then there is a gap from 35 to 70, plus it is a 77mm filter. Cheers Keith * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
