[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/07/2003 12:21:18:
> I actually have Breezebrowser which I bought as a tool for sorting and
> storing images - it's been excellent. I must admit that I had not
realised
> it was capable of RAW conversion and have been using Fileviewer. I just
had
> a quick look at it and converted a couple of images after making small
> changes. It seems to be fairly much on a par with Fileviewer and
certainly
> does not seem to have some of the functionality available with Capture
One.
> I will use it for my next few conversions and see how it goes.
BreezeBrowser uses the Canon SDK (just like FileViewer). The primary
advantage is an improved UI plus noise reduction - I don't know if
Canon's FVU supports profiles, either.
Capture One use there own (custom) RAW conversion routines rather than the
Canon SDK. This enables much faster preview as well as background
conversion.
Stuart
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
