Skip Middleton wrote: > There isn't much functional difference between the > 300D/RebelDigital and the 10D, except burst rate/cache, and a few other > details not yet revealed. They need, IMHO, to move the 10D or its successor > upstream a bit, with either faster capture rate, larger sensor, spot > metering, or some combination of those and other features. That may give us > the EOS3D or A2D or some such thing. Remember the 10s, A2, 3 succession...
I don't think I agree with you. There are a several differences between the 10D and the 300D, quite like the differences between the eos 30 and 300 film cameras. The 10D has custom functions (300D does not) and with the 300D you can't choose metering (evaluative, center, partial) and AF-mode (one shot versus AI servo) yourself, the camera selects them depending on the shooting mode. On the other hand, image sensor and shutter mechanisme are supposed to be the same, so picture quality should be equal. Rob Galbraith has a very nice comparison between both bodies on his site: http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-6270-6325 Bart :.________________ CONFIDENTIALITY : This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
