"Tom Pfeiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: > >Now that much of my photography is done with a 10D with a smaller sensor, >I've begun to wonder which of these lenses might be a better fit for me. I >like the IS on the 28-135mm a lot, as well as the ability to use it as a >one-lens kit, and now I wonder if my 20-35mm and a 35-350mm might make a >nice two lens kit.
I've heard that the 35-350 is decent enough optically, but IS is so so nice on a longer lens. I often shoot my 100-400 wide open down to 1/30th. That would be propped up on something, but still a far cry from no IS. I can't imagine not having IS, especially if a tripod won't be used most of the time. I have two lenses to fill between the 20-35 and the 100-400 but I rarely need them. I have the 50/1.4 and the 85/1.8. I usually either want wide, or long... Jim Davis Nature Photography http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
