Jim Davis Nature Photography wrote:
I threw together some samples of a worse case scenario at 3200, along
with my attempts to improve it using Capture One, Photoshop, and
Neatimage. Nothing optimized, nothing for sure, but you might enjoy
looking at it here:

http://jimdavis.oberro.com/html/3200.html

BTW, I haven't used 3200 very much at all. I have used 1600 once in
awhile when I had to. 800 is very decent. 1600 gets noisy. 3200 is
damned noisy. Sure beats pushing film though as far as I'm concerned.


Hi Jim,


from the text on your website I got  the impression you sharpened
before applying neatimage?! I didn't use neatimage yet, but I think
sharpening before reducing the noise would be counterproductive.
The other way round should produce better results.

Thomas Bantel

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to