----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Meier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 7:32 PM Subject: RE: Any new EOS lenses likely at PMA?
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob > Chandler > > > > Last year Canon introduced the 17-40 lens. I'd like to see the series > > continued with something like a 40-120. > > > > After all, on a digital > > a 17-40 is close to a 28-70 (on film) and > > a 40-120 would be close to a 70-200 (on film). > > In my opinion such a setup should always have an overlap in focal range. > If you are shooting around 40mm you end up changing lenses or body/lens > (if you have to bodies) constantly and possibly miss some good shots. So > something like 17-40 and 28-105 would be a much better setup in my > opinion. > > Robert > Robert, I agree. Which is why I have a 17-35 (although it's a Sigma) 28-135 and 100-400. It gives you a little leeway between lenses. Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
