Hi Jim, See comments inline...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:07:21 +0900, James B. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:01:46 +0100, Gerard Maas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: > > > > >I just did a series of comparisons, threw some examples to it and > >included images of the Ezybox hand bracket and the Manfrotto umbrella > >adaptor (finally answering the original question :-) > >I put all that online in one gallery on my website: > >http://www.gerardmaas.com/gallery_642.html > > > >The comparison was all using ETTL and no compensation. I didn't do any > >post processing adjustments to let the relative changes in exposure > >and colour temperature show. > > Good stuff. One question: did you have the flash tilted at 60 degrees > with the Omnibounce? The Omnibounce was tilted to target (aprox.) to the imaginary middle point between the flash and the subject on the ceiling. In this case, yes, it was about 60 degrees (maybe a bit more as my garage isn't quite big :-) > I'd like to see a comparison series with the light more at a classic > 45 degrees, rather than from the side level. The comparison was taken with the umbrella and softbox at (again, 'aprox') 45 degrees from the subject-to-camera axis. Here you have a 90 degree sidelight to compare with: http://www.gerardmaas.com/photo_3490.html >Also, the ceiling bounce > looks to have come from the side - how is that possible? The camera was vertical on the tripod, meaning that the flash was at one side. -greetings, Gerard. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
