Hi Tom: cool. I'll look into that. And yes I was talking 17-40L f4. I have good film results with the 20-35 but was a bit disappointed with the digital results. I think I set the camera at "parameter 1" but will try to tweek it tonight. :)
Thanks, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Pfeiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 9:57 AM Subject: RE: EOS Available light lens? > Gary: I've heard good things about the Sigma 20mm f/1.8, that might be one > to consider. > > The 20-35L I had was very sharp, I'd say as sharp as the 17-40L I have now > (and which is the lens your asking about, I believe), although I didn't own > them both at the same time. Since you mention this is a new 20D, maybe the > issue is the normal lack of in-camera sharpening and not your lens? > > Tom P. > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
