On 2/2/05, Bill Gillooly, discombobulated, unleashed: >I'd certainly like to own the Canon 14mm f/2.8 L, but it isn't going to >happen. > >Has anyone made a comparison between the Sigma 14mm f/2.8 EX and the >Tamron SP 14m f/2.8 Aspherical IF lenses? > >Does anyone know if the newer Tokina 17mm f/3.5 AT-X Pro is optically >better than the old 17mm f/3.5 AT-X > >That Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 has sounded good, but I'm not sure I'm >going to want to be buying anything from Sigma just yet. > >Too bad Canon chose to go the EF-S route with the 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM!
I recently did a few simple tests between a Sigma 14mm 2.8 and a Pentax 15mm 3.5 on my 1Dm2. <http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare3.html> The Sigma flares a lot, but out of the sun is not a bad performer. All these were shot on the Sigma: <http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/hip.html> HTH Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
