On 18 Feb 2005 at 2:35, Harman Bajwa wrote:
> --- Willem-Jan Markerink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, those who want less focal length should shop
> > for a secondhand
> > (or perhaps even today still factory-new??) Canon
> > ('FD') 20/3.5 micro
> > lens, and invest some more in extension tubes &
> > bellows (not
> > necessarily the expensive Novoflex toys....those can
> > only be
> > justified if you want to maintain AE/AF control with
> > EOS lenses,
>
> Are there reputed Canon FD in the range of 14-17mm ?
> Any pointers or reviews ? I have been playing with a
> zenitar fisheye and have no problems with MF/M-Mode so
> far. Might as well go into FD instead of the EF
> expensive EF lineup.
Just for macro?
Note that with normal FD lenses you either have to use an adapter
with additional (image-degrading) optics, acting as a slight
teleconverter (1.26x), or loose infinity-focus (with an optic-less
adapter, acting as a slight extension-tube).
Only for macro the FD-option is a 'clean' choice, sorry....;((
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
