The 350D also has the improved noise reduction that buys you one, maybe two ISO stops over the 10D/300D. This was posted on the 10D group and is a great example of the improved noise. ISO 1600 on the 10D would not be close to this:
http://pelourinho.com/bali/2005/20050326sel/05mar26-276.htm (photo by Jorge Vismara) On the downside, I've read that the 350D grip isn't big enough to really wrap your fingers around. Tom P. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > C. Perez-Palacio > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: EOS 350D v 10D > > Hi, > > With the launch of the 350D, I've seen in one of my local > stores a 10D refurbished body (with Canon warranty) cheaper > than the 350D (almost �100 > cheaper) and I wonder which one will be a better option. > > Some things I can think about: > > - 350D has 8MP but I'm sure many of you have produced > excellent quality pictures with 10D's 6MP. > - Any body I will use, it will be with the grip so the 350D > is going to be lighter and smaller, big advantage if travelling. > - E-TTL 2? Don't know how much difference it will made. > - EF-S lenses? Neither. > - Construction quality? I take a lot of care with my cameras > and not planning to do a cross-Sahara trip soon so not a big issue. > - 10D is discontinued (but also my film camera and it still works). > > As budget is a big issue for me, there's also the 300D+hack > option as I really want the new functions of the 350D over > the 300D... but black 300D's are difficult to find! > > Anybody with experience on both bodies? > > Cheers, > > Carlos * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
