I can corroborate this. I owned the Tamron 20-40 for a while and found it to be a fantastic lens. Incredibly sharp. Very pleasing in other ways too, color, contrast. A camera store pro I know told me that a medical equipment testing firm had bought 200 of them to use on calibration equipment. I regret selling mine now, which I only did because I was saving for a long tele for wildlife, which I shoot more of.

Ken


At 08:24 AM 5/6/2005, you wrote:
I know I posted this some time back but some friends and I did a test with different wide angles using a Canon Eos 1D Mark II. We tested the Caon 20-35 F2.8L (very good lens) against a Tamron 20-40mm F2.7-3.5. The Tamron blew the Canon away wide open, and while the Canon got better at F8, the Tamron was still better. I know this is blasphemy to many who only want Canon lenses, but this is the truth and something we were very very surprised to find. If someone is looking for the 20-35 Canon, save some money and get the 20-40 Tamron. You will not be sorry.


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to